US v. Troy, No. 08-2002

By FindLaw Staff on September 25, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's conviction of defendant for assaulting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 111(a) is affirmed as a rational factfinder could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer was acting within the scope of her official duties for the purposes of the statute.     

Read US v. Troy, No. 08-2002

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine

Decided September 25, 2009

Judges

Before:  Howard, Seyla, and Ripple, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Howard, Circuit Judge

Counsel

For Appellant:  Richard L. Hartley, Law Office of Richard Hartley.

For Appellee:  Renèe M. Bunker, Assistant United States Attorney, Paul D. Silsby, United States Attorney

Copied to clipboard