US v. Sarras, No. 08-11757

By FindLaw Staff on July 23, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's child pornography conviction and sentence are affirmed, where 1) defendant did not show that his expert witness's methodology was a sufficiently reliable identification technique; and 2) defendant's proffered testimony that child pornography cases usually involve multiple children would have been cumulative.

Read US v. Sarras, No. 08-11757

Appellate Information

Filed July 23, 2009


Opinion by Judge Quist

Copied to clipboard