US v. Jang, No. 08-10616

By FindLaw Staff on June 30, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

The revocation of Defendant's supervised release, based on his violation of a condition of his release by providing misleading answers to questions posed by a Korean consulate, is affirmed where the District Court could reasonably have concluded that Defendant made the statements with the intent to hinder his departure.

Read US v. Jang, No. 08-10616

Appellate Information

Filed June 30, 2009


Opinion by Judge Haynes

Copied to clipboard