US v. Gomez, No. 09-11031

By FindLaw Staff on August 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's identity theft conviction is vacated, where the District Court erred by failing to instruct the jury that the word "knowingly" in 18 U.S.C. section 1028A(a)(1) requires proof that he knew the means of identification belonged to an actual person.

Read US v. Gomez, No. 09-11031

Appellate Information

Filed August 28, 2009


Opinion by Judge Marcus

Copied to clipboard