US v. Emor, No. 07-3092

By FindLaw Staff on July 20, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's mail fraud conviction is affirmed, where: 1) there was no reasonable probability that the verdict would have been different had Defendant received certain undisclosed evidence; and 2) any variance between the indictment and the evidence presented at trial did not substantially prejudice his defense.

Read US v. Emor, No. 07-3092

Appellate Information

Argued December 8, 2008

Decided July 17, 2009


Opinion by Judge Griffith


For Appellant:

Peter V. Taylor, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Michael T. Ambrosino, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Washington, DC

Copied to clipboard