US v. Castillo-Estevez, No. 09-40096

By FindLaw Staff on February 11, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's sentence for illegal reentry into the U.S. after deportation is affirmed where the application of the 2008 Sentencing Guidelines to defendant was not a plain-error violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause because case law revealed a reasonable dispute regarding the ex post facto implications of retroactive application of the advisory guidelines.

Read US v. Castillo-Estevez, No. 09-40096

Appellate Information

Filed February 9, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Jones

Copied to clipboard