US v. Brockenborrugh, No. 08-3016

By FindLaw Staff on August 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's wire fraud conviction and sentence are affirmed, where: 1) there was ample evidence in the record from which the jury could reasonably infer that defendant was a knowing participant in the unlawful scheme to obtain the property at issue; and 2) the district court did not err in its calculation of loss.

Read US v. Brockenborrugh, No. 08-3016

Appellate Information

Argued April 9, 2009

Decided August 7, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Griffith

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Rogers

Counsel

For Appellant:

Richard K. Gilbert, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Florence Y. Pan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Washington, DC