Steadman v. Osborne, No. E046603

By FindLaw Staff on October 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's case against defendant claiming political abuse and misuse of campaign funds in connection with a measure, trial court's denial of defendant's motion to strike the ninth cause of action in plaintiff's complaint is reversed as plaintiff does not have the right to prosecute her ninth cause of action as a private attorney general under sections 89512.5, 89513, and 89514 of the Political Reform Act.     

Read Steadman v. Osborne, No. E046603 [PDF]

Read Steadman v. Osborne, No. E046603 [HTML]

Filed October 27, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Hollenhorst

Counsel

For Appellant:  Law Offices of Trent Thompson & Associates and Linda J. DeVore

For Appellee:  Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk, Paul T. Gough and Brian Hildreth; Joseph Michael Wojcik

Copied to clipboard