States Roofing Corp. v. Winter, No. 09-1067

By FindLaw Staff on December 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's suit against the Navy brought under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denying plaintiff's claim for additional costs incurred in connection with is contract to perform roofing work at a Naval facility is reversed and remanded as, plaintiff's interpretation of the contract as requiring waterproofing paint of the parapet walls was within the zone of reasonableness, and plaintiff is entitled to compensation for the additional costs incurred.   

Read States Roofing Corp. v. Winter, No. 09-1067

Appellate Information

Appeal from:  Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Decided December 7, 2009

Judges

Before Michel, Chief Judge, Newman and Lourie, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Newman, Circuit Judge

Counsel

For Appellant:  David W. Lannetti, Vandeventer Black LLP

For Appellee:    Jane C. Dempsey, US Department of Justice, Commerical Litigation Branch

Copied to clipboard