State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. v. Mintarsih, No. B202888

By FindLaw Staff on June 26, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a dispute involving insurance liability coverage, trial court judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) defendant established no basis to hold plaintiff liable for attorney fees awarded as costs against the insured party; 2) Insurance Code sec. 533 precludes indemnity for the damages awarded to defendant for false imprisonment and negligence; and 3) plaintiff has no obligation to pay additional postjudgment interest.    

Read State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. v. Mintarsih, No. B202888 in PDF

Read State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. v. Mintarsih, No. B202888 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark V. Mooney, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions.
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE.
Filed June 25, 2009

Judges
Before CROSKEY, J., KLEIN, P.J., ALDRICH, J.
Opinion by CROSKEY, J.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Horvitz & Levy, Barry R. Levy, Daniel J. Gonzalez; Grant, Genevose & Baratta, James M. Baratta and Jason S. Roberts.

For Defendant: Garrard & Davis, Donald A. Garrard; The Ehrlich Law Firm and Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich

Copied to clipboard