Seng v. Holder, No. 08-2485

By FindLaw Staff on October 08, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

A Cambodian national's petition for review of BIA's order, mandating removal from the United States and denying her application for asylum and protection under CAT, is denied where the IJ's findings that petitioner's testimony was not credible based on fundamental discrepancies and inconsistency in her testimony are supported by reasonably, substantial and probative evidence on the record.

Read Seng v. Holder, No. 08-2485

Appellate Information

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided October 8, 2009

Judges

Before: Boudin, Seyla, and Dyk, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Seyla, Circuit Judge

Counsel

For Appellant: Joseph A. MacDonald

For Appellee: Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Thomas B. Fatouros, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Ann M. Welhaf, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation