People v. Moore, No. B207616

By FindLaw Staff on August 12, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction for grand theft and perjury is affirmed where the trial court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations, as a third-party disbursing contractor is not the victim when a person defrauds a government funded program, and thus defendant did not establish as a matter of law that the statute of limitations on his crimes ran before the People filed the complaint.    

Read People v. Moore, No. B207616 in PDF

Read People v. Moore, No. B207616 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Patricia Titus, Judge. Affirmed.
Filed August 11, 2009

Before BIGELOW, J., RUBIN, Acting P.J., BENDIX, J.
Opinion by BIGELOW, J.

For Plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, James William Bilderback II and Alene M. Games, Deputy Attorneys General.

For Defendant: Lise M. Breakey, under appointment by the Court of Appeal. 


Copied to clipboard