People v. Millard, No. D047681

By FindLaw Staff on June 23, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Postjudgment order awarding restitution following defendant's conviction of driving under the influence while committing an act forbidden by law and causing bodily injury to another person is affirmed in part and reversed to the extent it awarded attorney fees and costs as a trial court may apply the doctrine of comparative negligence in awarding victim restitution against a criminally negligent defendant when the court finds the victim's contributory negligence was a substantial factor in causing his or her injuries.  

Read People v. Millard, No. D047681 in HTML

Read People v. Millard, No. D047681 in PDF

Appellate Information
APPEALS from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Orange, John A. Torribio, Judge. Judgment affirmed.
Decided: June 22, 2009

Before: McDONALD, J., HALLER, Acting P.J., IRION, J.
Opinion by: McDONALD, J.

Law Office of William J. Kopeny & Associates and William J. Kopeny for Defendant and Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, James D. Dutton and Melissa Mandel, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Copied to clipboard