People v. Martin, No. E046579

By FindLaw Staff on July 20, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Sentence for resisting an executive officer is affirmed where the trial court properly imposed the domestic violence conditions of probation, as the court was not barred by Harvey from imposing them, they were fitting and proper for defendant's rehabilitation, and were reasonably related to defendant's future criminality. 

Read People v. Martin, No. E046579 in PDF

Read People v. Martin, No. E046579 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. John N. Martin, Judge. Affirmed.
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO
Filed June 24, 2009
Published July 17, 2009

Judges
Before HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J., MCKINSTER, J., GAUT, J.
Opinion by HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Assistant Attorney General, and Lynne McGinnis and Kelley Johnson, Deputy Attorneys General

For Defendant: Conrad Herring, under appointment by the Court of Appeal.

Copied to clipboard