Martin Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Thompson Pacific Constr., Inc., No. C058944

By FindLaw Staff on December 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's suit against defendant-general contractor on a public works project, and its surety and bonding companies for monies owed at the end of the project, trial court's award of $150,000 in attorney fees to the defendants is affirmed as the trial court correctly concluded that defendant had not violated the applicable prompt payment statutes.     

Read Martin Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Thompson Pacific Constr., Inc., No. C058944 [HTML]

Read Martin Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Thompson Pacific Constr., Inc., No. C058944 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed December 4, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Cantil-Sakauye

Counsel
For Appellant:   Law Office of Anthony T. Caso, Anthony T. Caso; Nageley Meredith & Miller, Inc., Gregory Alan Meredith

For Appellee:   Solan & Park, Kevin M. Solan, William L. Jacobson

Copied to clipboard