Los Angeles Unified School District v. Pulgarin, No. B206892

By FindLaw Staff on June 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Trial court order order dismissing defendant's claim for loss of goodwill connected to the acquisition by eminent domain of real property is reversed where the court erred in concluding that defendant was not entitled to compensation for goodwill because it was a month-to-month tenant as nothing requires that a business owner's entitlement to goodwill must be based on a written lease on the property that is taken.     

Read Los Angeles Unified School District v. Pulgarin, No. B206892 in PDF

Read Los Angeles Unified School District v. Pulgarin, No. B206892 in HTML

 
Appellate Information
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Joanne O'Donnell, Judge. Reversed.
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR
Filed: June 23, 2009

Judges
Before EPSTEIN, P.J., MANELLA, J., SUZUKAWA, J.
Opinion by EPSTEIN, P.J.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Oliver, Sandifer & Murphy, Connie Cooke Sandifer and Cynthia C. Miller.

For Defendant: Century Law Group, Karen A. Larson and Daniel A. Woodford.

Copied to clipboard