Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270

In plaintiffs' suit against defendant for damages arising out of their sexual molestation by defendant's husband, trial court's judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) trial court properly sustained the demurrer with regard to plaintiffs' second and fifth causes of action for negligence; but 2) trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiffs' third and sixth causes of action for intentional misconduct.     

Read Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270 [HTML]

Read Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270 [PDF]

Filed November 6, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Pollak

Counsel

For Appellant:  Arnold I. Berschler

For Appellee:  Buresh, Kaplan, Jang & Feller, Lawrence A. Baker