Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270

By FindLaw Staff on November 09, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiffs' suit against defendant for damages arising out of their sexual molestation by defendant's husband, trial court's judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) trial court properly sustained the demurrer with regard to plaintiffs' second and fifth causes of action for negligence; but 2) trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiffs' third and sixth causes of action for intentional misconduct.     

Read Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270 [HTML]

Read Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270 [PDF]

Filed November 6, 2009


Opinion by Judge Pollak


For Appellant:  Arnold I. Berschler

For Appellee:  Buresh, Kaplan, Jang & Feller, Lawrence A. Baker

Copied to clipboard