Averianova v. Holder, No. 08-3167

By FindLaw Staff on January 28, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a petition for review of the BIA's denial of petitioner's motion to reopen her removal proceedings, the petition is denied where: 1) petitioner provided no meaningful argument in her brief to support her claim that the BIA abused its discretion in denying her motion to reconsider; and 2) petitioner failed to demonstrate changed conditions in her native Uzbekistan.

Read Averianova v. Holder, No. 08-3167

Appellate Information

Submitted: October 20, 2009

Filed: January 28, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Gruender

Copied to clipboard